China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Measures for Supervision of Online Transactions

Sat, 01 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 15 Mar. 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) issued the Measures. The Measures shall come into force as of 1 May 2021. The Administrative Measures for Online Transaction (网络交易管理办法) promulgated in the Order No.60 by the former State Administration for Industry and Commerce on 26 Jan. 2014 shall be abolished at the same time.

The Measures shall apply to business activities within the territory of the People’s Republic of China, including selling goods or providing services through the Internet and other information networks (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “network”). Market supervision and administration departments shall supervise and regulate the above business activities, and other business activities such as selling goods or providing services via online social networking, live broadcast and other information networking activities.

The Measures consists of 56 articles in five chapters, which respectively stipulates the obligations of online transaction operators and online transaction platform operators, the supervision and administration of market supervision and management departments, and the liabilities for illegal online transactions.

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)