China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Regulates Takeout Marketing to Curb Food Waste

Thu, 06 Mar 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 29 Nov. 2024, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) released the “Guidelines for Regulating Marketing Behaviors to Prevent Takeout Food Waste” (防范外卖餐饮浪费规范营销行为指引, hereinafter the “Guidelines”) to regulate the marketing behaviors of food delivery merchants and prevent food waste.

The Guidelines aims to guide food delivery merchants in addressing marketing behaviors that may lead to food waste and sets forth specific requirements to prevent food waste at various stages of the delivery process.

For example, the Guidelines encourages food delivery merchants to establish sound internal management systems to reduce raw material and finished product waste. It also requires that merchants set reasonable minimum order quantities and optimize discount mechanisms. The Guidelines further states that merchants are prohibited from producing, broadcasting, or distributing promotional content that encourages excessive consumption, such as live streams or videos promoting overeating or large portion sizes.

 

 

Photo by JM Lova on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)