China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Revises Anti-Unfair Competition Law

Mon, 29 Dec 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 27 June 2025, China’s top legislature, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, adopted the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China (2025 Revision)” (反不当竞争法(2025修订, hereinafter the “ Revision”), which came into force on 15 Oct. 2025.

This marks the second major revision of the law since its enactment in 1993, following its first revision in 2017. The updates aim to adapt to the developments of the digital economy and maintain orderly market competition.

The Revision adds eight new provisions, bringing the total to 41 articles, with a focus on unfair practices in the online sector, such as data theft, malicious trading, and reverse fake transactions. For example, the Revision prohibits operators from fraudulently obtaining others’ data by bypassing technical protections and forbids abuse of platform rules for fake reviews, fake transactions, or malicious returns that harm other businesses and consumers.

Regarding platform responsibilities, the Revision requires platform operators not to force or coerce merchants to sell goods below cost, preventing predatory pricing that disrupts market stability.

In addition, the Revision for the first time introduces regulations against the “abuse of relative dominant position” by large enterprises. This allows authorities to penalize big firms that impose unreasonable payment terms or withhold payments to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) without the need to first prove a traditional market dominance.

 

Photo by Joshua Fernandez on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.