China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Largest Academic Publisher CNKI Fined for Monopoly

Mon, 23 Jan 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

As we introduced in a previous post ‘China’s Largest Academic Publisher CNKI Faces Antitrust Investigation’, CNKI, an academic platform providing literature search services, has monopolized the online publication of almost all Chinese academic literature. It is as vital to China as RELX Group and Springer-Verlag to international academia.

In recent years, discontent with the monopolistic behavior of CNKI has become widespread in China’s academia. Many contend that CNKI has hindered the dissemination of academic knowledge and disregarded authors’ rights.

In May 2022, China’s antitrust regulatory authority, State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), put the case on file for investigation for alleged monopolistic practices of CNKI under the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China.

According to the SAMR, CNKI has been abusing its dominant position to monopolize the market since 2014, including the act of (1) selling its database services at an unfairly high price and (2) restricting academic journal publishers and universities from authorizing any third party to use academic literature data.

On 26 Dec. 2022, the SAMR made an administrative penalty decision, ordering CNKI to stop its violations and imposing a fine of 5% of its 2021 sales volume of 1.752 billion yuan within China, or 87.6 million yuan.

 

 

Cover Photo by Zhang qc on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.