China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s MOJ Issues Policy to Encourage Corporate Lawyers’ Participation in Corporate Compliance

Mon, 06 Mar 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 15 Dec. 2021, the regulatory authority for lawyers in China, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), issued the “Notice on Strengthening Corporate Lawyers’ Participation in Corporate Compliance Management” (关于加强公司律师参与企业合规管理工作的通知).

The MOJ recommends that corporate lawyers carry out the following works.

  • To assist enterprises in setting up compliance management systems;
  • To establish working mechanisms for enterprises such as early warning and prevention beforehand, response and disposal during the event, and evaluation and improvement afterward;
  • To establish a compliance-related culture within the enterprise;
  • To assist enterprises in establishing compliance management departments.

Related Posts:

Corporate compliance has become one of the hottest fields in China’s legal service industry in the last three years. On the one hand, it is due to China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate promoting corporate compliance non-prosecution work. On the other hand, it is also attributable to the work of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) - the regulatory authority of these enterprises - which requires China’s central state-owned enterprises to establish compliance management systems.

 

 

Cover Photo by Dongsh on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.