China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s National Platform for Lawyers’ Integrity Information Kicks Off

Mon, 07 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

One can find out here about the integrity information of all lawyers in China.

Recently, China’s National Platform for Lawyers’ Integrity Information (NPLII) has been in online operation. 

The public can log on to the website of NLII (https://credit.acla.org.cn) to inquire about information of full-time and part-time lawyers and firms nationwide including basic facts, annual assessment, awards, and penalties.

This platform was jointly developed by China’s Ministry of Justice (MOJ), the regulatory authority of lawyers, and the All China Lawyers Association (ACLA), the self-regulatory organization of Chinese lawyers. 

The “Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Lawyer System” (关于深化律师制度改革的意见) in 2016 has already required the establishment of a sound system for recording and publicizing information on the integrity of the lawyers.

The development of the NPLII started in 2019. In the mid-Nov. 2021, the platform launched a public test run and now has been in operation officially. 

 

 

Cover Photo by Barry Zhou on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.