China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

Tue, 24 Jun 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Apr. 2025, China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC) and Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) jointly released the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Intellectual Property (IP) Infringement” (hereinafter the “Interpretation”, 关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释) along with typical cases. The Interpretation clarifies the standards for identifying criminal counterfeiting of registered service trademarks, thereby strengthening IP protection in the service industry.

Formulated based on Amendment XI to China’s Criminal Law, this Interpretation provides a new systematic explanation of IP crimes. It incorporates three previous related judicial interpretations, which are now repealed.

The Interpretation contains 31 articles and is divided into five parts, including provisions on trademark crimes, the crime of counterfeiting patents, copyright crimes, trade secret crimes, and general provisions on IP crimes.

Taking trademark crimes as an example, the Interpretation further clarifies the identification standards for “identical goods/services”, “identical trademarks”, and “registered trademark symbols” that have been highly disputed in practice. Building on previous judicial interpretations, the Interpretations adds provisions on the criterion for criminalization of trademark crimes, such as counterfeiting registered service trademarks.

China has intensified IP criminal enforcement in recent years. According to the SPP’s White Paper on IP Prosecution Work (2024) (知识产权检察工作白皮书(2024)), in 2024, procuratorial organs nationwide accepted 1,338 cases involving 3,266 suspects for review and prosecution of copyright infringement crimes. This represents a year-on-year increase of 27.9% and 18.9% respectively. 2,090 individuals were prosecuted, an increase of 27.4% year-on-year.

 

 

Photo by sj on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.