China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Tightens Regulation on Data Transmission of Ride-Hailing Company

Mon, 05 Sep 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

The Ministry of Transport of China issued the "Measures for Operation and Management of Online Taxi-Hailing Regulatory Information Interactive Platforms" (网络预约出租汽车监管信息交互平台运行管理办法, hereinafter referred to as the "Measures") on 22 July 2022.

The Measures is designed for the data transmission and platform maintenance of the online taxi-hailing regulatory information interactive platforms.

According to the Measures, the data related to the operation service of online taxi transmitted by the online taxi platform company shall be directly connected to the official industry platform, which shall be subsequently transferred to the relevant provincial and city platform in real-time.

The transportation departments of governments at all levels are responsible for supervising the network security, data security and personal information protection and management of the information interactive platforms, tracking the data transmission, and preventing the data from being tampered with, damaged, leaked, illegally accessed or used.

 

 

Cover Photo by Andreas Felske on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)