China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Establish International Organization for Mediation in HK

Mon, 19 Dec 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

On 21 Oct. 2022, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China (MFA) and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) set up the Preparatory Office of the International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) in the HKSAR.

To this end, the two sides signed the “the Arrangement on the Establishment of the International Organization for Mediation Preparatory Office in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region” (关于在香港特别行政区设立国际调解院筹备办公室的安排).

The MFA stated that no international intergovernmental organization currently specializes in mediation despite the growing demand for mediation in the global community. Therefore, China and various foreign states jointly drafted and signed the “Joint Statement on the Future Establishment of the International Organization for Mediation” (the “Joint Statement”), deciding to initiate the establishment of the IOMed to provide mediation services. The membership of the IOMed will maintain openness and inclusiveness.

The IOMed Preparatory Office is expected to organize and carry out negotiations of the convention on its establishment from 2023.

As far as is known, the IOMed is the second international dispute settlement institution initiated by China.

Before that, China had launched the Beijing-based International Commercial Dispute Prevention and Settlement Organization (ICDPASP) in 2020.

 

 

Cover Photo by Peter Zhou on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)