China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Promote Diversified Settlement of Tourism Disputes

Wed, 28 Jul 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In June 2021, China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism and Ministry of Justice jointly issued the “Notice on Carrying out the Pilot Work of Connecting Mediation and Arbitration of Tourism Complaints” (关于开展旅游投诉调解与仲裁衔接试点工作的通知) (hereinafter referred to as the "Notice"), which proposes the establishment, on a pilot basis, of special arbitration platforms for tourism complaints in areas where conditions meet, promotes the connection of tourism complaint mediation and arbitration, and especially encourages the settlement of tourism disputes through mediation.

According to the Notice, the arbitration platform for tourism complaints shall be built by the local culture and tourism administrative authorities and arbitration institutions upon consultation. After receiving a tourism complaint, the tourism complaint handling authority shall mediate between the parties according to its duties, and then issue and serve a "Tourism Complaint Settlement Statement" (旅游投诉调解意见书) to the parties if a settlement agreement is reached. Where there exists an arbitration agreement, the authority may notify the parties to directly enter the process of rapid mediation during the arbitration procedure.

Where the parties fail to reach a settlement agreement, the tourism complaint handling authority may guide the parties to reach an arbitration agreement upon negotiation, and then enter the arbitration procedure for rapid mediation through the dispute arbitration platform for tourism complaints. During this process, where a settlement agreement is reached, the arbitral tribunal may make an award on the settlement at the request of the parties, or make an arbitral award based on the results of the settlement agreement and serve it to the parties; where no settlement agreement is reached through arbitration mediation, the arbitral tribunal may make an award in accordance with laws and regulations, issue and serve it to the parties.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yang Shuo (https://unsplash.com/@yangshuo) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.