China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Refine Rules on Administration of Human Genetic Resources

Tue, 26 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Mar. 2022, the Ministry of Science and Technology issued the proposed “Detailed Implementing Rules for Regulation on Administration of Human Genetic Resources (Draft for Public Comment)” (hereinafter “the Detailed Implementing Rules”, 人类遗传资源管理条例实施细则(征求意见稿)), which was open for public comments until 21 Apr. 2022.

The Detailed Implementing Rules proposes to provide that where it is indeed necessary to transport, mail or carry the materials of China’s human genetic resources out of China for the purpose of conducting scientific research through international cooperation by using China’s human genetic resources or for any other particular circumstances, the following conditions shall be met, and permission from Ministry of Science and Technology shall be obtained:

  • It causes no harm to China’s public health, national security, and public interest;
  • The entity has the legal person status;
  • There is a specific overseas partner and reasonable exit purpose;
  • The materials of human genetic resources are legally collected or from a legal preservation entity; and
  • It has passed the ethical review.

Prior to that, China had promulgated the “Regulation on Administration of Human Genetic Resources”(人类遗传资源管理条例) in March 2019.

 

 

Cover Photo by vigor poodo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)