China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

One-stop Diversified Dispute Resolution Center of Universal Beijing Resort Established

Sat, 23 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 18 Sept. 2021, Tongzhou Primary People's Court, Beijing held the unveiling ceremony of the One-stop Diversified Dispute Resolution Center of Universal Beijing Resort and published the “Work Program for the One-stop Diversified Dispute Resolution Center of Universal Beijing Resort” (北京环球度假区一站式多元解纷中心工作方案).

This Center mainly provides convenient and standardized “one-stop” judicial services such as legal risk assessment, provision of judicial suggestions, pre-litigation mediation, judicial confirmation, case filing registration, receipt and transfer of materials, query and consultation, and liaison with judges for disputes over compensation for personal injury and property damage between tourists, contract disputes between tourists and the relevant business, company or enterprise (s) as well as other disputes occurring within the resort area and suitable for the handling by the Center. The Center is planned to gradually realize the whole process online litigation services.

 

 

Cover Photo by Li Yang (https://unsplash.com/@ly0ns) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)