China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SAMR to Regulate Administrative Penalties against Price-related Illegal Activities

Mon, 02 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 2 July 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) released the Provisions on Administrative Penalties against Price-related Illegal Activities (Draft for Public Comment) (hereinafter referred to as “the Daft”, 价格违法行为行政处罚规定(修订征求意见稿)), whose public opinion period closes on 2 Aug. 2021. The Daft for Comment aims to maintain the price order and protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and business operators.

In accordance with the Daft, where the business operator violates Article 14 (2) of the Price Law, dumps goods at prices below the normal price so as to squeeze out competitors or monopolize the market, thus disrupting the normal order of production and operation and damaging the interests of the State or the lawful rights and interests of other business operators, the business operator shall be ordered to make corrections, confiscated of his/her illegal gains, and may be concurrently fined not more than five times of his/her illegal gains.

 

 

Cover Photo by David Emrich (https://unsplash.com/@davidemrich) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.