China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Guiding Cases on Biodiversity Conservation

Tue, 04 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 3 Dec. 2021, the SPC issued the 31st batch of guiding cases (concerning biodiversity conservation).

The newly-released cases concerning ecological and environmental protection include civil public interest litigation, administrative penalty, and civil public interest litigation collateral to criminal proceedings.

According to the guiding cases, restoration is attached great importance when judges hear cases regarding biodiversity conservation.

As guiding case No.172 clarifies, courts may refer to expert opinions and other professional opinions from Forest Management Units for Planning and Design, competent authorities over nature reserves, etc. when determining the obligation of the accused to restore the forest ecosystems and environment.

For further information on China’s Guiding Cases System, please refer to our previous posts on “China’s Guiding Cases”.

 

 

Cover Photo by Wei Cheng on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)