China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Guiding Cases to Streamline Enforcement

Fri, 20 Jun 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 Apr. 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released its 45th batch of guiding cases, focusing on enforcement implementation to unify judicial standards and enhance enforcement efficiency.

This batch of six cases addresses challenges in enforcement. They provide courts with practical guidance, improving efficiency while balancing mandatory force with humanitarian considerations.

For example, the Guiding Case No. 252, “Zhejiang X New Materials Co., Ltd. Enforcement Cases”, demonstrates centralized enforcement and the coordination between enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. When a debtor faces multiple enforcement cases across different regions, a higher court may designate one court for centralized enforcement, thus avoiding procedural duplication and reducing litigation costs.

In this case, when the debtor company under enforcement entered pre-restructuring due to debt issues, the court assigned all relevant cases to a court with bankruptcy jurisdiction. This approach facilitates effective coordination between enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings and protects creditors’ rights and creates opportunities for corporate restructuring.

Statistics show that Chinese courts nationwide concluded 9.1182 million enforcement cases in 2024, with enforced amounts over CNY 2 trillion (or USD 277.8 billion). However, challenges like inter-regional coordination and conflicts in multi-case enforcement continue to hinder enforcement quality and efficiency. In response, the SPC compiled these guiding cases to strengthen enforcement standardization.

 

 

Photo by Victor He on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.