China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Interpretation on Judicial Compensation Execution

Mon, 07 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 8 Feb. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning Application of Law in Trials of Compensation Execution-Related Cases” (hereinafter “the Interpretation”, 关于审理涉执行司法赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释), which took effect on March 1, 2022.

The Interpretation mainly touches upon the issue of state compensation to the victims after the court has made mistakes in the enforcement of judgments and other legal instruments.

The Interpretation will provide an avenue of remedy and relief for parties who have been damaged by court enforcement.

The Interpretation, composed of 20 articles, regulates the filing of judicial compensation-related cases, remedy procedures, the identification of compensation and execution liability, the scope and standard of compensation for damages, etc.

The Interpretation applies to cases where the people’s courts, in the process of executing judgments, rulings, and other legal instruments, erroneously take enforcement measures including property investigation, control, disposal, delivery, and distribution or compulsory measures like fines and detention, violating the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations and causing damage, and the victims may apply for compensation in accordance with the provisions of Article 38 of the State Compensation Law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Sifan Liu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.

China MOJ Boosts World-Class Arbitration Institutions

In 2025, China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ) launched an initiative to cultivate leading international arbitration institutions with Chinese characteristics, selecting 22 for the first batch amid growing global recognition of Chinese arbitration hubs.