China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Investment Protection

Wed, 26 Mar 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 2 Jan. 2025, the fifth anniversary of the implementation of China’s Foreign Investment Law, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released its first batch of typical cases on protecting foreign investment interests. These cases aim to implement the national treatment and negative list management system for foreign investments, demonstrating efforts to maintain foreign investment order and enhance investor confidence.

This batch includes five cases involving disputes over damages to company interest, shareholders’ information rights, dissolution of companies, return of company certificates, and liability for transactions with related parties.

For example, in Case No.3 involving Tokyo-based A Co., Ltd. and Song, there is a dispute over the return of company certificates. Tai Company in Zhongshan City, a wholly foreign-owned limited liability company, had A Co., Ltd. as its sole shareholder. The former legal representative of Tai Co. refused to execute shareholder decisions and board resolutions. Taking advantage of the convenience of holding the company business certificates, the representative engaged in actions that harmed Tai Co.’s interests. The Zhongshan Primary People’s Court, Guangdong, issued a preservation of conduct, ordering the former legal representative to act according to certain requirements and prohibiting certain actions to prevent further damage, thereby safeguarding the normal operations of the foreign-invested enterprise.

 

 

Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)