China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Investment Protection

Wed, 26 Mar 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 2 Jan. 2025, the fifth anniversary of the implementation of China’s Foreign Investment Law, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released its first batch of typical cases on protecting foreign investment interests. These cases aim to implement the national treatment and negative list management system for foreign investments, demonstrating efforts to maintain foreign investment order and enhance investor confidence.

This batch includes five cases involving disputes over damages to company interest, shareholders’ information rights, dissolution of companies, return of company certificates, and liability for transactions with related parties.

For example, in Case No.3 involving Tokyo-based A Co., Ltd. and Song, there is a dispute over the return of company certificates. Tai Company in Zhongshan City, a wholly foreign-owned limited liability company, had A Co., Ltd. as its sole shareholder. The former legal representative of Tai Co. refused to execute shareholder decisions and board resolutions. Taking advantage of the convenience of holding the company business certificates, the representative engaged in actions that harmed Tai Co.’s interests. The Zhongshan Primary People’s Court, Guangdong, issued a preservation of conduct, ordering the former legal representative to act according to certain requirements and prohibiting certain actions to prevent further damage, thereby safeguarding the normal operations of the foreign-invested enterprise.

 

 

Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.

China MOJ Boosts World-Class Arbitration Institutions

In 2025, China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ) launched an initiative to cultivate leading international arbitration institutions with Chinese characteristics, selecting 22 for the first batch amid growing global recognition of Chinese arbitration hubs.