China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Third China-ASEAN Justice Forum Adopts Nanning Statement

Tue, 30 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 20 July 2022, the third China-ASEAN Justice Forum (hereinafter “the Forum”) was held in Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the delegates unanimously adopted the Nanning Statement.

Under the theme of “Establishing a High-Level Judicial Cooperation Platform to Jointly Building the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road”, the delegates extensively exchanged opinions on a variety of topics, including “Accelerate the Adaptation of New RCEP Economic and Trade Rules to Provide Better Judicial Services for Regional Trade and Investment.”

The Nanning Statement, written in both English and Chinese, contains the following highlights.

(1) The participants expressed their willingness to continue using the Forum to improve regional judicial cooperation.

(2) The participants recognized the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) as a comprehensive, modern, high-quality, and inclusive free trade agreement and acknowledged that more open, free, and transparent economic and trade rules within the region are instrumental in facilitating trade and investment and promoting economic globalization.

(4) The participants will strengthen the exchanges and cooperation in the field of judicial protection of intellectual property rights.

(5) The participants will continue reinforcing research and exchange on online litigation to meet the demand for justice services in the era of the digital economy.

(6) The participants agreed to further strengthen the cooperation in judge training and exchange of model cases.

Prior to that, the first and second China-ASEAN Justice Forums were held in 2014 and 2017, respectively.

 

 

Cover Photo by NII on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.