China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

17th Conference of SCO Supreme Courts Presidents Adopts Joint Statement

Mon, 26 Sep 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

On 18 Aug. 2022, the 17th conference of presidents of supreme courts of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) member states (第十七次上海合作组织成员国最高法院院长会议) adopted a landmark joint statement - the 17th joint statement of the presidents of supreme courts of the SCO member states (第十七次上海合作组织成员国最高法院院长会议联合声明, hereinafter referred to as the "Joint Statement").

The Joint Statement looks forward to the prospect of further deepening cooperation between judicial authorities of various countries in various fields, and reaches a consensus on issues such as alternative dispute resolution, adjudication of bankruptcy disputes and children adoption cases, application of artificial intelligence and automation in judicial procedures, the crackdown on cybercrime, improvement of administrative litigation procedures, communications, discussion, and joint training.

Established on 15 June 2001, the SCO currently comprises eight member states, namely China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan.

The conference of presidents of supreme courts of the SCO member states began in 2006.

 

 

Cover Photo by Nandini Khandelwal on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)