China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Court Issues 2022 Annual Report on Judicial Review Cases in Domestic Arbitration

Tue, 10 Oct 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The Beijing Fourth Intermediate Court (BFIC) has jurisdiction over two of the largest arbitration institutions in China, namely the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) and Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC), making it a major player in China’s arbitration landscape.

Related Posts:

On the morning of 25 July 2023, the BFIC held a press conference to release its “2022 Annual Report on Judicial Review Cases in Domestic Arbitration” (2022年国内仲裁司法审查案件报告, hereinafter the “Report”), and reported ten typical cases.

According to the Report, the BFIC accepted 938 judicial review for domestic arbitration cases in 2022, including 549 cases for setting aside arbitral awards, accounting for 58.5%, and 389 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements, accounting for 41.5%.

The BFIC rendered decisions to set aside arbitral awards in seven cases and to re-arbitrate in seven cases, with the latter typically involving issues in the arbitration procedure that could be remedied through a new arbitration, thereby upholding the parties’ choice of arbitration.

 

 

Photo by 李大毛 没有猫 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)