China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Enforces Foreign Emergency Arbitrator Order for the First Time

Wed, 21 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

In 2021, the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Court (hereinafter the Beijing Court) enforced an emergency order made by an arbitrator appointed by the Swiss Chamber of Commerce International Arbitration Institute (SCAI), which is believed to be the first time that a Chinese court has enforced a foreign emergency arbitration order and stayed the original enforcement of the arbitral award.

On 15 Dec. 2021, the Beijing Court suspended the enforcement of an SCAI arbitration award based on the award issued by the emergency arbitrator appointed by the SCAI.

Information about the case comes from a case report by Cyan Law Firm (采安律师事务所), a leading Chinese arbitration law firm.

On 22 June 2020, the Beijing Court issued Civil Ruling (2020) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No.3, recognizing and enforcing SCAI’s arbitration award No. 300386-2016 issued on 7 Jan. 2019.

The respondent filed a new arbitration application with SCAI, arguing that it was not jointly and severally liable under this award. On 22 Sept. 2021, SCAI determined that the respondent was indeed not jointly and severally liable. On 29 Sept. 2021, the respondent applied for emergency relief.

On 29 Oct. 2022, an emergency arbitrator appointed by the SCAI issued an award requiring the applicant not to enforce the original SCAI award.

After that, the respondent submitted such an order of the emergency arbitrator to the Beijing Court and provided a guarantee.

On 15 Dec. 2021, the Beijing Court issued Enforcement Ruiling No.2 (2020) Jing 04 Execution No. 210 to suspend the execution of the Civil Ruling (2020) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No.3.

According to Cyan Law Firm, this is the first case in which a Chinese court has respected the validity of a foreign emergency arbitrator’s order and stayed the original enforcement of arbitral award.

 

 

Cover Photo by Marc-Olivier Jodoin on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.