China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Court Issues Guidelines on Evidence Rules in IPR Civil Litigation

Wed, 26 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 22 Apr. 2021, Beijing High People's Court held a press conference on trial work of intellectual property rights (IPR) cases in Beijing courts, and issued the “Guidelines of Beijing High People's Court on Evidence Rules Evidence in Civil Litigation of Intellectual Property Rights (北京市高级人民法院知识产权民事诉讼证据规则指引).

The Guidelines contains six parts, which provide guidance on the presentation of evidence for disputes over infringement of patent rights, copyrights, trademarks, and unfair competition, apart from the General Provisions and Supplementary Provisions. The Guidelines aims to ensure the accurate application of the “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Litigation of Intellectual Property Rights (关于知识产权民事诉讼证据的若干规定) issued by China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).

The Guidelines set out provisions in line with the latest development of forensic technologies. According to the Guidelines, information carriers based on new technologies that reflect the facts of a case, such as evidence kept by a third party and evidence formed by blockchain technology, could be provided by the parties as evidence. For such evidence, the court shall, in the light of the formation process, expression form and the content of evidence as well as the characteristics of new technologies, comprehensively determine the authenticity and reliability of the information it carries and its relevance to the case, so as to decide the evidentiary weight thereof. Furthermore, for notary preservation or blockchain deposition preservation, the electronic data in the information network environment should be examined in terms of the production process of notary documents, the generation process of blockchain deposition records, the formation process of the web page and its release time, the qualification and credit status of the website managing the web page, the technical means adopted for notarization, and the technical environment of blockchain deposition.

 

 

Cover Photo by vnwayne fan (https://unsplash.com/@vnwayne) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.