China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Announces Types of Financial Derivatives Available for Foreign Investors

Thu, 25 Nov 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

According to the official website of China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), the “Announcement on the Participation of Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors and RMB Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors in Financial Derivatives Transactions” (hereinafter “the Announcement”, 关于合格境外机构投资者和人民币合格境外机构投资者参与金融衍生品交易的公告) was jointly issued by CSRC, the People’s Bank of China and State Administration of Foreign Exchange on 15 Oct. 2021, and came into force on 1 Nov. 2021.

According to the Announcement, Qualified Foreign Investors (QFI) will be eligible to trade commodity futures, commodity options and stock index options.

Moreover, trades of stock index options are limited to transactions with hedging purposes.

The CSRC addressed the expanding QFI investment scope as an important step to further the reform of the onshore market and open up the domestic securities and futures market. Additionally, it would provide foreign investors with more hedging products and allocation tools.

 

 

Cover Photo by Silas Hao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)