China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Details Implementation Rules for Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law

Thu, 22 May 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 23 Mar. 2025, China’s State Council released the “Provisions on the Implementation of the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law of the People’s Republic of China” (hereinafter the “Provisions”, 实施《中华人民共和国反外国制裁法》的规定), further refining the legal framework for countering foreign sanctions and enhancing its operability.

The Provisions specifies a wide range of countermeasures, including asset freezes (covering cash, equity, intellectual property, etc.), transaction restrictions (in areas such as trade, technology, and culture), as well as prohibitions on investment and cross-border data transfers. The Provisions also strengthens enforcement mechanisms by requiring coordinated efforts among relevant authorities and authorizing sanctions, such as restrictions on imports, exports, and data transfers, against entities that refuse to comply with countermeasures.

Notably, the Provisions extends the reach of countermeasures into the judicial arena. If a foreign country, organization, or individual harms China’s sovereignty, security, or development interests through lawsuits or other legal actions, the relevant parties may be placed on a countermeasure list.

This Provisions complements the 2021 Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law and aims to safeguard national interests in a complex international landscape.

 

 

Photo by JM Lova on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)