China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Implements First Association Standards for Overseas Warehouse of Cross-border E-commerce

Mon, 18 Jul 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 20 Apr. 2022, Zhejiang Province E-commerce Center issued a set of association standards called the “Operation and Service Management Specifications for Overseas Warehouses of Cross-Border E-Commerce” (《跨境电子商务海外仓运营与管理服务规范》, hereinafter referred to as the “Specifications”) on its portal.

The Specifications, as China’s first set of association standards for overseas warehouses of cross-border e-commerce, reflects the Chinese government’s support for export through cross-border e-commerce over the last two years.

The Specifications is not legally binding. It has incorporated good practices and suggestions of China’s representative cross-border e-commerce enterprises with overseas warehouses, logistics, or online shopping platforms.

The Specifications has
(1) specified the definition of “cross-border e-commerce overseas warehouses” and other terminology;
(2) classified the cross-border e-commerce overseas warehouses;
(3) clarified the critical operational processes and specifications of overseas warehouses from the perspectives of operation management, service management, implementation guarantee, evaluation improvement, etc.; and
(4) provided guidelines for cross-border e-commerce enterprises to construct, operate and manage overseas warehouses.

Prior to that, the State Council issued the “Opinions on Accelerating the Development of New Forms and Models of Foreign Trade” (关于加快发展外贸新业态新模式的意见) and the “Opinions on Promoting Foreign Trade to Maintain Stability and Improve Quality” (关于推动外贸保稳提质的意见) in July 2021 and May 2022 respectively. These policies indicate the government’s strong support for the development of cross-border e-commerce and overseas warehouses.

 

 

Cover Photo by Barry Zhou on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)