China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

Mon, 14 Oct 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 July 2024, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), the Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security held a press conference to release ten typical cases of cracking down on cross-border telecom and online fraud and related crimes. It aims to demonstrate the determination of judicial organs to crack down on cross-border telecom fraud and to raise public awareness of fraud detection and prevention.

According to the Ministry of Public Security, cross-border telecom and online frauds have the following new features. Firstly, they are more organized, showing traits of transnational organized crime. Secondly, they are formed in specific zones, represented by extremely large-scale fraud parks and “industrial parks”. Thirdly, they are using new technologies such as blockchain, virtual currencies, AI, remote control, and screen sharing to constantly upgrade their criminal tools.

At the conference, the three authorities jointly issued the “Opinions on the Application of Law in Handling Cross-border Telecom and Online Fraud and Other Criminal Cases” (hereinafter the “Opinions”, 办理跨境电信网络诈骗等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见). The Opinions requires judicial organs nationwide to focus on cracking down on criminal groups and their organizers, planners, directors, and key members. It also emphasizes targeting crimes committed by these groups, such as intentional homicide, intentional injury, kidnapping, rape, forced prostitution, and illegal detention.

 

Photo by Penghao Xiong on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)