China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Measures for Data Export Security Assessment

Mon, 15 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 July 2022, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) issued the “Measures for Data Export Security Assessment” (数据出境安全评估办法, hereinafter referred to as the “Measures”), which will come into effect on 1 Sept. 2022.

According to the Measures, under certain circumstances, data processors providing data abroad shall apply to the CAC for security assessment via their local provincial-level cyberspace authority.

Specifically, the Measures applies to the security assessment of data processors providing abroad essential data or personal information that is collected or generated through their operations within the territory of China.

A data processor triggers a data export security assessment when:

(1) it provides essential data abroad;

(2) it is an operator of critical information infrastructure, or it processes over 1,000,000 people’s personal information;

(3) it has exported over 100,000 people’s personal information or 10,000 people’s sensitive personal information abroad since 1 Jan. of the previous year; or

(4) it encounters any other situation that requires a data export security assessment as stipulated by the CAC.

 

 

Cover Photo by Johnny Wang on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)