China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Legalizes VIE Structure, Offshore Listings will Require Registration

Fri, 21 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Dec. 2021, China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued the “Regulatory Provisions of the State Council on the Offshore Securities Issuance and Listing of Domestic Companies (Draft for Public Comment)” (hereinafter “the Draft”, 国务院关于境内企业境外发行证券和上市的管理规定(草案征求意见稿)) for public opinions.

The Draft allows mainland-incorporated companies to issue securities overseas or launch offshore listings if they are in compliance with domestic laws and rules.

This deals with situations when an enterprise with its principal place of business being mainland China, issues or lists securities abroad in the name of a foreign entity based on its domestic equity, assets, profits, or other similar interests.

According to the Draft, VIE-structured companies that meet the compliance requirements can go ahead with offshore listing after filing. This is the first time that China has clarified the legality of VIE structure.

The CSRC said that some offshore-listed firms have committed serious violations of laws, which has damaged the overall international image of Chinese companies and adversely affected their overseas financing. Therefore, China has strengthened its supervision with regard to this issue through the unified filing system.

In the meantime, the CSRC set out a “negative list” of offshore listings that are explicitly prohibited, including listing and financing explicitly prohibited by laws and regulations, threatening or jeopardizing national security, in regard to major ownership disputes, involving illegal or criminal activities, etc.

The CSRC also issued the “Administrative Measures for the Filing of Offshore Securities Issuance and Listing of Domestic Companies (Draft for Public Comments)” along with the Draft for public comments.  

 

 

Cover Photo by Ian on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.