China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Legalizes VIE Structure, Offshore Listings will Require Registration

Fri, 21 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Dec. 2021, China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued the “Regulatory Provisions of the State Council on the Offshore Securities Issuance and Listing of Domestic Companies (Draft for Public Comment)” (hereinafter “the Draft”, 国务院关于境内企业境外发行证券和上市的管理规定(草案征求意见稿)) for public opinions.

The Draft allows mainland-incorporated companies to issue securities overseas or launch offshore listings if they are in compliance with domestic laws and rules.

This deals with situations when an enterprise with its principal place of business being mainland China, issues or lists securities abroad in the name of a foreign entity based on its domestic equity, assets, profits, or other similar interests.

According to the Draft, VIE-structured companies that meet the compliance requirements can go ahead with offshore listing after filing. This is the first time that China has clarified the legality of VIE structure.

The CSRC said that some offshore-listed firms have committed serious violations of laws, which has damaged the overall international image of Chinese companies and adversely affected their overseas financing. Therefore, China has strengthened its supervision with regard to this issue through the unified filing system.

In the meantime, the CSRC set out a “negative list” of offshore listings that are explicitly prohibited, including listing and financing explicitly prohibited by laws and regulations, threatening or jeopardizing national security, in regard to major ownership disputes, involving illegal or criminal activities, etc.

The CSRC also issued the “Administrative Measures for the Filing of Offshore Securities Issuance and Listing of Domestic Companies (Draft for Public Comments)” along with the Draft for public comments.  

 

 

Cover Photo by Ian on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.