China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Promulgates Regulations to Systematize Framework Against Foreign Extraterritorial Overreach

Wed, 03 Jun 2026
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

On April 7, 2026, the State Council of the People’s Republic of China promulgated the PRC Regulations on Countering Foreign Improper Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (中华人民共和国反外国不当域外管辖条例), effective immediately. The new administrative regulations introduce several core legal mechanisms—including anti-enforcement injunctions, a "malicious entity list," and statutory civil remedies—marking the evolution of China’s legal countermeasures from isolated blocking orders into an integrated, comprehensive defense network.

The Regulations are explicitly designed to safeguard China's national sovereignty, security, and development interests, while protecting the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens and organizations.

To achieve these objectives, the framework establishes a multi-layered countermeasure system:

  • Identification Mechanism: The Ministry of Justice (MOJ), in coordination with relevant government departments, is tasked with assessing and identifying foreign measures that constitute improper extraterritorial jurisdiction. Once an official public announcement is made, no organization or individual within China may comply with, or assist in enforcing, the designated foreign measures.
  • Anti-Enforcement Orders (Injunctions): For the first time, a formal “anti-enforcement order” (Jinzhi Ling) system has been codified. This mechanism empowers the MOJ to issue administrative orders directly prohibiting compliance with designated foreign extraterritorial rules.
  • Malicious Entity List: A newly established “Malicious Entity List” will target foreign organizations and individuals who actively promote or participate in implementing improper extraterritorial measures. Listed entities and individuals will face severe countermeasures, including asset freezes and comprehensive transaction bans.

 

Photo by Victor He on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)