China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Promulgates Regulations to Systematize Framework Against Foreign Extraterritorial Overreach

Wed, 03 Jun 2026
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

On April 7, 2026, the State Council of the People’s Republic of China promulgated the PRC Regulations on Countering Foreign Improper Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (中华人民共和国反外国不当域外管辖条例), effective immediately. The new administrative regulations introduce several core legal mechanisms—including anti-enforcement injunctions, a "malicious entity list," and statutory civil remedies—marking the evolution of China’s legal countermeasures from isolated blocking orders into an integrated, comprehensive defense network.

The Regulations are explicitly designed to safeguard China's national sovereignty, security, and development interests, while protecting the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens and organizations.

To achieve these objectives, the framework establishes a multi-layered countermeasure system:

  • Identification Mechanism: The Ministry of Justice (MOJ), in coordination with relevant government departments, is tasked with assessing and identifying foreign measures that constitute improper extraterritorial jurisdiction. Once an official public announcement is made, no organization or individual within China may comply with, or assist in enforcing, the designated foreign measures.
  • Anti-Enforcement Orders (Injunctions): For the first time, a formal “anti-enforcement order” (Jinzhi Ling) system has been codified. This mechanism empowers the MOJ to issue administrative orders directly prohibiting compliance with designated foreign extraterritorial rules.
  • Malicious Entity List: A newly established “Malicious Entity List” will target foreign organizations and individuals who actively promote or participate in implementing improper extraterritorial measures. Listed entities and individuals will face severe countermeasures, including asset freezes and comprehensive transaction bans.

 

Photo by Victor He on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.