China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Negative List for Market Access (2022 Edition)

Tue, 03 May 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Mar. 2022, China’s National Development and Reform Commission released the Negative List for Market Access (2022 Edition) (hereinafter “the List”, 市场准入负面清单(2022年版)), further expanding the market areas in which domestic and foreign investors can operate.

The List includes six prohibited access items and 111 permitted access items, totaling 117 items, which is 6 items less than its 2020 edition.

In terms of prohibited access items, the List clarifies that illegal internet-related business activities are prohibited, and P2P lending information intermediaries are prohibited from providing credit enhancement services, collecting or gathering funds directly or indirectly, illegally fund-raising, or jeopardizing national interests and public interests.

The List and the Negative List for foreign investment jointly constitute a unified system of laws and regulations for market access in China.

For foreign investors, both of the said two negative lists need to be consulted to clarify which industries, fields, and businesses are not allowed for investment, which shall be subject to licensing and which can be freely decided.

For domestic investors, only the List needs to be consulted.

The List shall come into force from the date of publication, and its 2020 Edition (Fa Gai Ti Gai Gui (2020) No. 1880) (发改体改规〔2020〕1880号) issued on 10 Dec. 2020 shall be repealed at the same time.

 

 

Cover Photo by gabriel xu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)