China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s SPC-IPC Issues 2022 Annual Report on Intellectual Property

Mon, 12 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 11 Apr. 2023, China’s Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court (SPC-IPC) issued its 2022 annual report.

The full title of the report is the “Annual Report of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court 2022”.

In 2022, SPC-IPC accepted 6,183 technology-related IP appeal cases and Monopoly appeal cases (including 4,405 newly accepted cases and 1,778 closed existing cases), and closed 3,468 cases.

Compared with 2021, the number of total accepted cases (consisting of both newly accepted and unclosed existing cases) increased by 18%, of which new cases increased by 1.6% and the number of closed cases increased by 0.2%.

In 2022, SPC-IPC accepted 2,956 new second-instance substantive civil disputes, of which 615 involved infringement of invention patents, 968 on infringement of utility patents, 312 on patent application rights and patent ownership, 144onnew plant variety, 6 on the layout design of integrated circuit, 78 on technological secrets, 648 on computer software, 96 on technology-related IP contracts, 15onmonopoly disputes, and 74 on other disputes. The number of new cases relating to new plant variety and layout design of integrated circuit was significantly higher than that of the previous year.

Between 2019 and 2022, SPC-IPC accepted 8,436 cases involving second-instance substantive civil disputes, of which 1,860 involved infringement of invention patents, 2,982 on infringement of utility models, 697 on patent application rights and patent ownership, 272 on new plant variety, 14onintegrated circuit layout design, 213 on technological secrets, 1,743 on computer-software, 342 on technology-related IP contracts, 79 on monopoly, and 234onother disputes.

For more information on the SPC-IPC, please click here.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yu Wan on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)