China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Prevent Speculation Risks in Virtual Currency Trading

Thu, 21 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In September 2021, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the People's Bank of China and other seven authorities issued the “Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of Speculation Risks in Virtual Currency Trading” (hereinafter “the Notice”, 关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币交易炒作风险的通知).

The Notice reiterates that virtual currencies issued by non-monetary authorities that use encryption technologies, distributed accounts or similar technologies and exist in digital forms, such as Bitcoin and Ether, including so-called stable coins like Tether, do not have the same legal status as legal tender and cannot circulate in the market. Virtual-currency-related services including virtual currency exchange, trading virtual currencies as central counterparties, providing matchmaking services for virtual currency transactions, token fundraising, and virtual currency derivatives trading are defined as illegal financial activities. It is also illegal for overseas virtual currency exchanges to provide services to residents in China through the Internet.

 

 

Cover Photo by yuru cao (https://unsplash.com/@chloeruru) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.