China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Promote Integrated Development of Domestic and Foreign Trade

Sat, 26 Feb 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Dec. 2021, the State Council issued the “Opinions on Promoting the Integrated Development of Domestic and Foreign Trader” (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 于促进内外贸一体化发展的意见).

The Opinions suggests that, on the one hand, China will ensure its export capability, and on the other hand, China also wants companies to apply their strength in export commodities to the domestic market.

The Opinions sets out 15 measures in four aspects regarding the integration of domestic and foreign trade, including improving the institution and mechanism, strengthening the capabilities, accelerating the process, and improving the guarantee measures.

Here are the key takeaways:

  1. Promoting the coordination of laws and regulations as well as the convergence of the supervision systems, business qualification, standards and quality, inspection and quarantine, certification standards of domestic and foreign trade;
  2. Encouraging Chinese institutions to participate in international standardization activities and strengthen collaboration with enterprises upstream and downstream of the global industry chain in order to jointly set the international benchmark;
  3. Improving the quality of domestic products, for example, domestic products and export products should be produced on the same production line, to the same standard and of the same quality;
  4. Encouraging large Chinese trade and logistics enterprises to enter the international market and improve global service networks; and,
  5. Guiding foreign trade entities, cross-border e-commerce and logistics enterprises to accelerate the construction of overseas warehouses, distribution centers and other logistics infrastructures, as to improve the logistics network.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yu Gui on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)