China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Updates Regulation for State Secrets Law

Tue, 17 Sep 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 June 2024, the State Council revised and adopted the "Regulation on the Implementation of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Guarding State Secrets” (中华人民共和国保守国家秘密法实施条例), which shall come into force on 1 Sept. 2024.

This revision aims to implement the “Law on Guarding State Secrets” (保守国家秘密法), which was revised in February this year.

Related Post:

The highlights of this revision are as follows.

  • This revision clarifies that an organ or agency with classification authority shall make a list of state secret matters and revise it promptly when necessary.
  • This revision refines the confidentiality management requirements for personnel before, during, and after holding positions involving state secrets, while improving the system for safeguarding their rights and interests.
  • This revision clarifies the principles and requirements for formulating national secrecy standards, group standards, and enterprise standards while also refining and improving the scope and specification of confidentiality inspections.

 

Photo by Chi Hung Wong on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)