China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Takes on Case as Local Company Sues Amazon for Market Dominanc Abuse

Wed, 08 Nov 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

In August 2023, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court accepted a case filed by Guangzhou Mengbian Information Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Plaintiff”) against Amazon Services Europe Sarl (“Amazon Europe”) for alleged abuse of market dominance.

This case marks the first instance of the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court handling a cross-border e-commerce company’s dispute against an overseas e-commerce platform for the abuse of market dominance.

The Plaintiff is an e-commerce company focusing on foreign trade, which is engaged in cross-border trade agency and goods import and export.

The Plaintiff alleges that Amazon is the world’s largest overseas e-commerce platform operator, and Amazon Europe is Amazon’s European subsidiary, holding a dominant market position in the field of e-commerce within Europe.

The Plaintiff asserts that Amazon Europe abused Article 3 of the self-drafted “Amazon Services Europe Business Solutions Agreement” to close the Plaintiff’s online store, disable its account, and refuse transactions without justified reasons.

The Plaintiff requests the court to order Amazon Europe to unblock the Plaintiff’s frozen account, to modify the algorithm and data of the buy box as well as the platform in order to allow the Plaintiff to freely choose logistics service providers and to compete fairly with products sold by Amazon; and to seek compensation from Amazon Europe for economic losses incurred and the refund of the account balance.

The case is currently in the stage of serving the summons to Amazon Europe.

 

 

Photo by Rafik Wahba on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.