China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

CNIPA Releases Guidelines to Back IP Rights

Mon, 26 Apr 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

Recently, CNIPA issued the Annual Work Guidelines for Promoting High-Quality Development of Intellectual Property (2021) (“the 2021 Guidelines”, 推动知识产权高质量发展年度工作指引(2021)).

The 2021 Guidelines emphasizes strengthening the implementation of supporting policies for the high-quality development of intellectual property rights. Among them, CNIPA stresses in the supporting policies that it will improve the policy of intellectual property rights protection, including: (1) strengthening the administrative protection of intellectual property rights, and promoting the administrative adjudication of patent infringement disputes; (2) strengthening the development of integrity system in the field of intellectual property rights; (3) promoting the establishment of intellectual property arbitration and mediation institutions and strengthening the assistance mechanism for safeguarding intellectual property rights in the settlement of intellectual property disputes; (4) promoting the efficient operation of the guidance center for overseas intellectual property disputes resolution, so as to help Chinese enterprises safeguard their rights and interests overseas.

The Guidelines includes a 2021 task list of CNIPA with a total of 22 items in its annexes, including severely cracking down on illegal acts of trademark and patent agencies, among which the key work is to tackle the acts of providing agency and registration services for malicious preemptive registration of trademarks, acting as the patent agent without qualifications, acting as the agent for irregular patent applications not for the purpose of innovation, soliciting business by improper means, and canceling the government subsidies applied by the agencies that have committed such practice and so on.

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.