China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Jiangsu Court Releases Typical Cases on Consumer Protection

Sun, 02 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 15 Mar., Jiangsu High People’s Court and the Consumer Protection Commission of Jiangsu Province jointly promulgated the Ten Typical Cases of Consumer Protection in 2020 in Jiangsu Province.

The typical cases (2020) involve disputes over car rental service contracts, disputes over orders placed via delivery Apps and the free refilled amount, and disputes over matchmaking service contracts, etc. These disputes reflect the diverse pattern of China's society consumption and various forms of consumers’ rights and interests.

Among others, one typical case involves the public interest litigation, which marks the largest punitive damages awarded nationwide in consumer protection cases.

In this case, since March 2017, the defendants have been bottling the water from a lake without permission, alleging that it has functions for health care, and the products were sold to more than 20 provinces and cities across the country. In accordance with test results, there is no evidence that the ingredients in the water function as alleged, and that consumers who drink the water over a long period of time will suffer from relevant diseases. As a result, the procuratorate initiated the public interest litigation and argued that the defendant's false publicity and sales of fake and substandard products infringed on the interests of unspecified consumers, which constituted fraud, and punitive damages should be paid in an amount equal to three times of the total price of consumption. Changzhou Intermediate People’s Court held that the defendants’ behavior was in violation of Article 55 of the Consumer Rights Protection Law (消费者权益保护法) and infringed the legitimate rights and interests of many consumers, and so ordered the defendant to pay the punitive damages, a total amount of over CNY 70 million, three times of the sales amount.

Pursuant to Article 55 of the Civil Procedure Law of China (民事诉讼法), where a people's procuratorate finds any act that damages the protected ecological environment and resources, any infringement upon the legitimate rights and interests of a large number of consumers in the field of food and drug safety, or any other act that damages the public interest, while performing its duties, and there is no statutory competent organ or organization or such organ or organization does not initiate a lawsuit, the people's procuratorate may initiate the prosecution, which is known as the “procuratorial public interest litigation” system in China.

The case concerns the rights and interests of a large number of consumers. After the procuratorate initiates the public interest litigation, the court awarded punitive damages against the operator, which not only effectively punished the illegal business operation, but also lightened the litigation burden of consumers.

After the damages has been enforced in full, the consumer may apply for the damages to the competent organ with the consumption receipts and other materials, and the remaining amount may be used for other public welfare purposes in consumer protection.

This case provides a great example for the exploration of public interest litigation in consumer protection.

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.