China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

MCT to Regulate Online Performance Brokerage Agencies

Wed, 13 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Aug. 2021, the “Administrative Measures for Online Performance Brokerage Agencies” (hereinafter “the Measures”, 网络表演经纪机构管理办法) issued by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (MCT) entered into force. The Measures sets out stricter requirements over the business qualification, control over the performance content, online anchor management, and internal staff management of online performance brokerage agencies. The Measures also grants an 18-month transition period. An entity will not be punished if it engages in online performance brokerage activities without obtaining the relevant qualification within 18 months. 

The content providers of online performances mainly include operators of online performances, online performers, and online performance brokerage agencies. Online performance brokerage agencies connect live-streaming content producers with broadcast channels, but they have been in a regulatory gap for a long time. The Measures closes this regulatory gap.

According to the Measures, an online performance brokerage agency mainly provides anchors with certain brokerage services such as the signing of a contract, promotion and representation, and provides business services such as the organization, production and marketing of the online performance contents. At the same time, it provides online performance entities with anchors suitable to give online performances and takes charge of the daily management of anchors.

An online performance brokerage agency shall bear the following obligations for online performers in accordance with the Measures: (1) to verify the identity of the performers by effective means like face-to-face interviews and video calls within the scope permitted by the Personal Information Protection Law, so as to avoid the imposture; (2) to sign a written contract with the performers; and (3) to strengthen education and training for the performers, inform them of the laws, regulations and professional ethics that they shall abide by, and forbid the appearance of any illegal or irregular content in their live-stream.

 

 

Cover Photo by Vincent Tint (https://unsplash.com/@cmc_sky) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.