China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Rebuild Credit after Discipline? China Issues Rules to Restore Credit Information

Mon, 27 Feb 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 11 Jan. 2023, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China’s State Council released the “Measures on the Management of Credit Information Restoration after Correction of Dishonest Behaviors (For Trial Implementation)” (hereinafter the “Measures”, 失信行为纠正后的信用信息修复管理办法(试行)).

NDRC says China will not impose permanent disciplinary measures on dishonest entities.

To some extent, the disciplinary system for dishonesty has promoted various social entities to keep promises. However, the purpose of the disciplinary system for dishonesty is not to “abandon” the dishonest entities permanently, but to promote the correction of their dishonest behavior and rebuild their credit. Therefore, credit subjects who meet the relevant conditions can apply for credit information restoration.

What the credit subjects can repair is the dishonesty information, but not the dishonest behavior. In other words, the credit subjects can repair their state of dishonesty at the information level, but cannot “whitewash” the dishonest behavior and restore the honesty between people before the occurrence of the dishonest behavior.

Credit information can be restored by removing it from lists of seriously dishonest entities, stopping the display of administrative punishment information, and restoring other dishonesty information.

 

 

Cover Photo by Akira on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)