China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Court Pioneers Support for Arbitration Evidence Collection in China

Fri, 05 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 1 Dec. 2023, a local court in Shanghai issued an investigation order for an arbitration institution, marking the first instance of Chinese courts providing such an order to assist an arbitration institution.

The Shanghai Arbitration Commission (SHAC) accepted a case involving a dispute over an industrial property purchase agreement, which required the retrieval of real estate registry information from the Minhang District Natural Resources Confirmation and Registration Service Center.

Traditionally, in arbitration cases requiring investigation and evidence collection, arbitration institutions would issue letters of assistance for investigation, and the parties or the arbitration institution would present the letters for investigation purposes.

However, as these letters of assistance were not enforceable, they often hindered the effectiveness of evidence collection.

In this case, SHAC submitted a request for assistance to the Minhang Primary People’s Court, Shanghai, which issued an investigation order to the arbitration institution. Subsequently, SHAC successfully obtained the real estate registration information with the given investigation order.

The reason why SHAC was able to obtain this investigation order is based on the Shanghai High People’s Court’s “Measures of Shanghai High People’s Court on Issuing Investigation Orders to Assist Arbitration in Investigation and Evidence Collection (For Trial Implementation)” (上海市高级人民法院关于开具调查令协助仲裁调查取证的办法(试行)), introduced in November 2023, which allows Shanghai courts to issue investigation orders for arbitration institutions.

In recent years, local authorities in China have been making efforts to support arbitration, and this event is a notable example of such support.

 

 

Photo by MIGUEL BAIXAULI on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.