China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Court Pioneers Support for Arbitration Evidence Collection in China

Fri, 05 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 1 Dec. 2023, a local court in Shanghai issued an investigation order for an arbitration institution, marking the first instance of Chinese courts providing such an order to assist an arbitration institution.

The Shanghai Arbitration Commission (SHAC) accepted a case involving a dispute over an industrial property purchase agreement, which required the retrieval of real estate registry information from the Minhang District Natural Resources Confirmation and Registration Service Center.

Traditionally, in arbitration cases requiring investigation and evidence collection, arbitration institutions would issue letters of assistance for investigation, and the parties or the arbitration institution would present the letters for investigation purposes.

However, as these letters of assistance were not enforceable, they often hindered the effectiveness of evidence collection.

In this case, SHAC submitted a request for assistance to the Minhang Primary People’s Court, Shanghai, which issued an investigation order to the arbitration institution. Subsequently, SHAC successfully obtained the real estate registration information with the given investigation order.

The reason why SHAC was able to obtain this investigation order is based on the Shanghai High People’s Court’s “Measures of Shanghai High People’s Court on Issuing Investigation Orders to Assist Arbitration in Investigation and Evidence Collection (For Trial Implementation)” (上海市高级人民法院关于开具调查令协助仲裁调查取证的办法(试行)), introduced in November 2023, which allows Shanghai courts to issue investigation orders for arbitration institutions.

In recent years, local authorities in China have been making efforts to support arbitration, and this event is a notable example of such support.

 

 

Photo by MIGUEL BAIXAULI on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.