China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Ten Typical Cases involving the Internet

Wed, 14 Jul 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 31 May 2021, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) held a press conference to release ten Typical Cases involving the Internet, covering a wide range of disputes, including those over IP rights infringement, unfair competition, contracts, and crimes of infringing copyright.

Among them, the case of Hangzhou Huatai Media Culture Media Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Daotong Technology Development Co., Ltd. concerning the dispute over the infringement on the right of communication of information on networks (杭州华泰一媒文化传媒有限公司诉深圳市道同科技发展有限公司侵害作品信息网络传播权案) ((2018) Zhe 0192 Min Chu No. 81) heard by Hangzhou Internet Court was China's first case where blockchain technology was used for evidence deposition. After examining the qualification of depository platforms, the credibility of forensics technology used for the infringing webpage, and the integrity of electronic evidence deposition through blockchain technology, the court clarified the determination of the validity of blockchain, taking it as a new type of electronic evidence. The court also summarized the basic rules for determining the validity of such electronic evidence in accordance with the provisions of the Electronic Signature Law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jie Mi (https://unsplash.com/@jimmymi) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.