China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Reports on Anti-monopoly and Anti-unfair Competition Cases

Mon, 26 Dec 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

On 17 Nov. 2022, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) held a press conference to release details of the anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition cases dealt with by the people’s courts in recent years.

The highlights of the press conference are as follows:

  1. From 2013 to June 2022, the national courts concluded a total of 916 anti-monopoly civil cases in the first instance and 32,075 unfair competition cases in the first instance.
  2. The damages for intellectual property (IP) infringement awarded by Chinese courts are on the rise. In the cases of trade secret infringement, one example is the Vanillin case, where the damages awarded by the SPC amounted to around CNY159 million; another one is the Carbomer case, in which the punitive damages awarded by the SPC amounted to around CNY 30 million.
  3. The SPC has formulated standards for the identification of monopolistic behaviors on Internet platforms and regulated monopolistic behavior in the Internet field such as monopoly agreements and abuse of market dominance.
  4. The SPC is exploring judicial rules for big data competition protection, so as to reasonably divide the ownership and boundaries of data rights and interests, and maintain data rights and privacy rights of users.

 

 

 

Cover Photo by Zhang Linxuan on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.