China Justice Observer


EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Sets Rules for Collegial Panel Operation

Tue, 13 Dec 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 Oct. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) promulgated the “Opinions on Regulating the Operating Mechanism of Collegial Panels” (hereinafter the “Opinions”, 关于规范合议庭运行机制的意见).

The collegial panel is the basic judicial organization of the Chinese courts. In Chinese litigation, a case is heard by a sole judge or a collegial panel. However, significant cases are all tried by a collegial panel.

The Opinions issued by the SPC summarizes the previous rules on collegial panels and formulates new comprehensive rules.

The Opinions consists of a total of 11 articles, among which the notable provisions are as follows:

  1. All members of a collegial panel shall equally participate in case trials.
  2. All members of a collegial panel shall independently express their views on evidence admissibility, the finding of facts, application of law, litigation procedures, and judgment results, and assume the corresponding responsibilities.
  3. A collegial panel may be composed of members designated or randomly selected. For complicated cases, the court president or tribunal director may appoint members of the collegial panel according to their powers and functions.
  4. The collegial panel shall have one of its judges as the responsible judge, who shall perform the following responsibilities of organizing and coordinating the trial:
    1. Leading or instructing ancillary judicial personnel in ancillary trial work;
    2. Requesting for deliberation of the collegial panel on procedural applications filed by the parties such as jurisdictional challenges, appearance in court of witnesses, and exclusion of illegally obtained evidence;
    3. Presenting opinions on the review of the evidence and drafting the trial scheme;
    4. Preparing or instructing ancillary judicial personnel to draft trial reports and retrieval reports of similar cases;
    5. Preparing judgment documents according to the collegial panel’s deliberation opinions or the judicial committee’s decisions.
  5. In the deliberation by a collegial panel, if there is a divergence in opinions, the collegial panel shall make a decision according to the majority opinion, but the minority opinion shall also be included in the transcript.



Cover Photo by JuniperPhoton on Unsplash



Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Interprets International Treaties & Practices in Chinese Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) reaffirmed the supremacy of international treaties over domestic laws in foreign-related civil and commercial cases with its “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of International Treaties and International Practices”(关于审理涉外民商事案件适用国际条约和国际惯例若干问题的解释).

China Releases Typical Cases of Private Fund Crimes

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) and Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) jointly released five typical cases of private fund crimes, aiming to establish uniform standards for handling such crimes nationwide and combatting criminal activities within the private fund sector.

SPC Releases IP Guiding Cases

In December 2023, China’s Supreme People's Court issued its 39th batch of guiding cases focused on intellectual property rights, covering various aspects such as IPR infringement disputes, patent ownership, and copyright ownership.

SPC Releases Judicial Interpretation on Contract Law

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court issued a judicial interpretation on the Contract section of the Civil Code, aimed at guiding courts in adjudicating disputes and ensuring nationwide consistency in application.

China Introduces New Drunk Driving Convictions Standards Effective 2023

In December 2023, China announced updated standards for drunk driving convictions, stating that individuals who drive with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 80mg/100ml or higher on a breath test may be held criminally liable, according to the recent joint announcement by the Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, and Ministry of Justice.