China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Publishes First IP Crime Prosecution White Paper

Wed, 31 Jul 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Apr. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released the “White Paper of Intellectual Property Crime Prosecution (2021-2023)” (知识产权检察工作白皮书(2021—2023年)).

This is the first time that the SPP has published a white paper related to IP crimes, which provides an overview of IP cases involving criminal, civil, administrative, and public interest prosecution handled by Chinese procuratorates over the past three years.

From 2021 to 2023, the number of IP crimes accepted, reviewed, and prosecuted by procuratorates nationwide rose from 22,000 to 30,700. In addition, the number of IP cases involving civil or administrative prosecution supervision has been increased significantly year by year, with a 3.1-fold year-on-year increase in 2021, a 72.2% year-on-year increase in 2022, and another 1.7-fold year-on-year increase to 2,508 cases in 2023.

The white paper selects several typical cases for illustration. The SPP has guided procuratorates at all levels to handle a number of criminal cases involving infringement of enterprises’ key technologies in emerging fields such as chip manufacturing, power batteries, artificial intelligence, and biomedicine. Take, for example, the case of Zhang and others infringing on commercial secrets. In this case, the Shanghai Procuratorate determined in accordance with the law that the defendant company had colluded with employees of the victim company to illegally obtain the chip technology for the design and production of the same type of chips, and that the reasonable licensing royalties on the technology involved amounted to hundreds of millions of CNY.

 

 

Photo by Kayla Kozlowski on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.