China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases Typical Cases of Public Interest Litigation on Cultural Heritage Protection

Tue, 03 Sep 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 8 June 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released a batch of typical cases of public interest litigation focused on protecting cultural relics and heritage, with the aim of improving the preservation and utilization of cultural relics through public interest litigation.

Among this batch of eight cases, the protected objects include historical buildings, ancient cultural relics sites, etc., and address common violations such as damaging cultural relics’ appearance and illegally occupying cultural heritage sites.

For instance, in Case No. Two, the historical appearance and ecological environment of the Sharaitamu Beacon Tower (part of the Tang Dynasty Great Wall) in Baicheng County, Aksu, Xinjiang, were damaged by a local company’s unauthorized installation of cable poles. Administrative measures were insufficient to protect the relics, so the local procuratorate filed a civil public interest lawsuit, requiring the violator to bear the restoration costs, with professional institutions carrying out protective archaeological restoration. The court supported the request, and the damaged cultural relics were effectively protected.

Since October 2019, procuratorial organs nationwide have filed over 17,000 public interest litigation lawsuits in the field of cultural relics and heritage protection.

 

 

Photo by Aaron Greenwood on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.

China MOJ Boosts World-Class Arbitration Institutions

In 2025, China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ) launched an initiative to cultivate leading international arbitration institutions with Chinese characteristics, selecting 22 for the first batch amid growing global recognition of Chinese arbitration hubs.