China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases Typical Cases of Public Interest Litigation on Cultural Heritage Protection

Tue, 03 Sep 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 8 June 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released a batch of typical cases of public interest litigation focused on protecting cultural relics and heritage, with the aim of improving the preservation and utilization of cultural relics through public interest litigation.

Among this batch of eight cases, the protected objects include historical buildings, ancient cultural relics sites, etc., and address common violations such as damaging cultural relics’ appearance and illegally occupying cultural heritage sites.

For instance, in Case No. Two, the historical appearance and ecological environment of the Sharaitamu Beacon Tower (part of the Tang Dynasty Great Wall) in Baicheng County, Aksu, Xinjiang, were damaged by a local company’s unauthorized installation of cable poles. Administrative measures were insufficient to protect the relics, so the local procuratorate filed a civil public interest lawsuit, requiring the violator to bear the restoration costs, with professional institutions carrying out protective archaeological restoration. The court supported the request, and the damaged cultural relics were effectively protected.

Since October 2019, procuratorial organs nationwide have filed over 17,000 public interest litigation lawsuits in the field of cultural relics and heritage protection.

 

 

Photo by Aaron Greenwood on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.