China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

State Council Moves to Strengthen Social Credit System - China Legal News

Sat, 16 Jan 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In December 2020, General Office of the State Council issued the Guiding Opinions on Further Improving the Dishonesty Restraint System and Building a Long-term Mechanism for Credit Construction.

On 18 Dec. 2020, the General Office of the State Council issued the Guiding Opinions on Further Improving the Dishonesty Restraint System and Building a Long-term Mechanism for Credit Construction (关于进一步完善失信约束制度构建诚信建设长效机制的指导意见), which defines the main tasks of improving the dishonesty restraint system and strengthening the social credit system.

The Opinions highlights the following principles to follow: 

(1) Comply with laws and regulations strictly. The records of dishonest behaviors, the determination of the list of seriously dishonest subjects, and the punishment for dishonest behaviors, which are closely related to the vital interests of individuals, enterprises, and other subjects, must operate strictly under the rule of law. 

(2) Define the scope accurately. To prevent improper use and abuse, it’s necessary to accurately define the scope of credit information and the determination of the list of seriously dishonest subjects and reasonably use the disciplinary measures for dishonest behaviors. 

(3) Ensure that the punishment is commensurate with the misconduct. To effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the credit subjects, disciplinary measures of different types and with different intensity should vary according to the fields in which dishonest behavior occurs, the seriousness of the circumstances and the degree of impact. 

(4) Learn from international experience. Based on our national conditions and fully refer to international practices, prudence is called for to promote the development of the credit system in the fields where there appear social concerns and ununiform understanding and make relevant measures in line with international standards.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.