China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Supreme Courts of China and Singapore Sign MOU in Litigation-Mediation-Litigation (LML)

Mon, 17 Jul 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The Memorandum refers to the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation on the Management of International Commercial Disputes in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) through a Litigation-Mediation-Litigation (LML) framework (hereinafter the “MOU”, 通过诉中调解框架管理“一带一路”倡议背景下国际商事争议的合作谅解备忘录).

On the morning of 1 Apr. 2023, Judge Tao Kaiyuan, Vice President of the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and Grand Justice of the second rank, and Justice Belinda Ang Saw Ean of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Singapore signed the MOU in Beijing.

The features of this MOU, as described by the Supreme Court of Singapore, are as follows.

  1. The Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) and the China International Commercial Court (“CICC”) will, in accordance with the MOU, each develop and implement the LML framework for the management of BRI international commercial disputes.
  2. The LML framework developed and implemented by each court will have the following salient features:
  • Case management conferences may be convened for the court to determine the procedural steps (such as in the form of a court ruling, case management memorandum or notice, where applicable) and to give directions for the timely and cost-efficient management and resolution of the dispute;
  • The court may grant a stay of court proceedings for a specified period for the parties to the dispute to reach a settlement through mediation, and any party to the dispute may, for good reason, apply for an extension of that period;
  • Every mediation is to be conducted on a “without prejudice” basis, and is private and confidential;
  • Should the parties to a dispute reach a settlement as a result of mediation, the court may give a judgment, or issue a statement having the effect of a judgment, to facilitate the recognition and enforcement of the mediated settlement;
  • The parties to a dispute are entitled to have a mediation conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of a mediation institution chosen by those parties, or the rules agreed or submitted to by those parties in accordance with the applicable law.

 

 

Photo by Ovinuchi Ejiohuo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.