China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Update on China’s Anti-Monopoly Law: Rules on Platform Economy to be Further Clarified

Mon, 25 Jul 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 16 June 2022, a spokesperson for the Commission of Legislative Affairs of the National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee said that the Draft Amendment to the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) submitted for second review would further clarify the specific rules for the application of anti-monopoly-related provisions in the platform economy.

The current AML, enacted in 2007, is the most important law in the field of competition in China. Over the last three years, anti-monopoly enforcement has been increasingly frequent, especially against internet platforms.

In this process, the current AML falls behind the needs of law enforcement. Therefore, China has begun to revise the law.

It is known that the Draft Amendment to the AML for the second review proposes to make five major revisions:

(1) To clarify that the “Anti-Monopoly Law Enforcement Agency under the State Council” is the enforcement agency of the AML.

(2) To further clarify the specific rules for the application of anti-monopoly-related provisions in the platform economy.

(3) To improve the “safe harbour” mechanism for monopoly agreements.

(4) To improve the investigation and handling procedures for the concentration of business operators that do not reach the declaration threshold.

(5) To set out specific requirements for the review of the concentration of business operators.

 

 

Cover Photo by Hu Chen on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.