China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Promotes Artificial Intelligence Development

Tue, 08 Aug 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 23 May 2023, the Beijing Municipal Government (hereinafter the Beijing) issued the “Several Measures to Promote the Innovation and Development of Artificial General Intelligence (general AI) in Beijing” (hereinafter the Measures, 北京市促进通用人工智能创新发展的若干措施).

Noteworthy points in the Measures are as follows.

  • Beijing will take the lead in establishing a Public Computing Power Center to centralize the city’s computing resources.
  • Beijing will establish open basic training data sets to provide high-quality data.
  • Beijing will promote the construction of a general AI technology system such as large-scale models.
  • Beijing will facilitate the application of general AI technologies in innovative scenarios, such as providing opportunities for AI to be used in government services, medical services, and other fields.

 

 

Photo by Jisun Han on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)