China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Releases Measures for Reforming and Optimizing Development of Legal Service Sector

Mon, 23 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 20 July 2021, Beijing Municipal Commission of Development and Reform and Beijing Municipal Bureau of Justice jointly released Several Measures of Beijing on Reforming and Optimizing the Development of Legal Service Sector” (hereinafter referred to as the “Measures”, 北京市关于改革优化法律服务业发展环境若干措施).

The Measures provides several supports to the development of an international commercial arbitration center: 

  1. to encourage well-known foreign arbitration institutions and international commercial mediation organizations to set up branch offices in China (Beijing) Pilot Free Trade Zone and to carry out foreign-related arbitration and mediation business in civil and commercial disputes resolution;
  2. to encourage Chinese and foreign parties in applying for and executing interim measures such as preservation of property, evidence, and conduct before and during arbitration in accordance with law; 
  3. to establish the International Dispute Resolution Center in Beijing, and to support the set-up of internationally renowned arbitration institutions, dispute resolution institutions and law firms as well; and
  4. to support state-owned enterprises and municipal enterprises to choose arbitration institutions in Beijing for commercial arbitration and choose Beijing as the place of arbitration when signing foreign-related contracts.

 

 

Cover Photo by Road Trip with Raj (https://unsplash.com/@roadtripwithraj) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.